|
February
22, 2005
New York
Times
By SARAH
LYALL
LONDON,
Feb. 21
- Five
years
after
Britain
lifted
its ban
on gays
in the
military,
the
Royal
Navy has
begun
actively
encouraging
them to
enlist
and has
pledged
to make
life
easier
when
they do.
The navy
announced
Monday
that it
had
asked
Stonewall,
a group
that
lobbies
for gay
rights,
to help
it
develop
better
strategies
for
recruiting
and
retaining
gay men
and
lesbians.
It said,
too,
that one
strategy
may be
to
advertise
for
recruits
in gay
magazines
and
newspapers.
Commodore
Paul
Docherty,
director
of naval
life
management,
said the
service
wanted
to
change
the
atmosphere
so that
gays
would
feel
comfortable
working
there.
"While
some
gays
were
confident
to come
out,
others
didn't
feel
that the
environment
was
necessarily
accepting
of
them,"
Commodore
Docherty
said in
an
interview.
The
partnership
with
Stonewall,
Commodore
Docherty
said,
will
help
"make
more
steps
toward
improving
the
culture
and
attitude
within
the
service
as a
whole,
so gays
who are
still in
the
closet
feel
that
much
more
comfortable
about
coming
out."
Gays in
Britain
have
benefited
from a
number
of new
laws,
including
one that
makes it
illegal
for
employers
to
discriminate
on the
basis of
workers'
sexuality.
Last
year,
Parliament
passed
the
Civil
Partnership
Act,
which
gives
marriage-style
rights
to
British
gays who
have
registered
as
couples.
The
entire
military
is
subject
to the
legislation,
and
starting
in the
fall,
gay
couples
in the
military
who have
registered
under
the act
will be
allowed
to apply
for
housing
in
quarters
previously
reserved
for
married
couples.
The new
effort
continues
a
pattern
of
changing
official
attitudes
in the
navy -
once
derided
as
running
on rum,
sodomy
and the
lash, in
a phrase
usually
attributed
to
Winston
Churchill.
And
while
most
European
militaries
have
lifted
bans on
gays,
none
have
been as
active
as the
Royal
Navy in
encouraging
their
service.
Until a
European
court
ruled in
1999
that
Britain's
ban on
gays in
the
military
violated
European
human-rights
laws,
the
navy,
along
with the
rest of
the
country's
military,
followed
a
no-exceptions
policy
of
dismissing
service
men and
women
who were
found to
be gay,
often
after
long and
intrusive
investigations.
The
military
had
agonized
for
years
over the
issue,
in the
way the
United
States
has, and
always
concluded
that
allowing
gays and
lesbians
to serve
would
prove
prohibitively
disruptive
and
would
ruin
discipline
and
cohesion.
But
after
the
court
ruling,
it had
no
choice
but to
reverse
its
policy.
Beginning
in 2000,
the
military
said
gays
would no
longer
be
prohibited
from
serving.
It also
stopped
monitoring
its
recruits'
sex
lives,
saying
that
sexuality,
as long
as it
did not
intrude
into the
workplace,
should
not be
an issue
one way
or
another.
Recently,
gay men
and
women in
the
British
services
have
lived
and
fought
in Iraq
alongside
heterosexuals
without
problems,
according
to
military
officials.
"I would
say that
before
the
European
court
ruling,
it was
difficult
to see
this
policy
happening
or
working,"
said Lt.
Cmdr.
Craig
Jones, a
gay
naval
officer
who
often
speaks
publicly,
with the
navy's
approval,
on gay
rights
issues.
"People
were
quite
hot
under
the
collar
about
it; the
admirals,
generals
and air
marshals
were
really
concerned,"
he
added.
"I'm
quite
sure
that
these
folks
look now
and
think,
'What
was all
that
fuss
about?'
"
Most
European
countries,
including
France,
Germany,
Spain,
Switzerland
and
Denmark,
have
lifted
their
bans on
gays in
the
military.
But
Britain,
and
particularly
the
navy,
has gone
further,
said
Aaron
Belkin,
director
of the
Center
for the
Study of
Sexual
Minorities
in the
Military
at the
University
of
California,
Santa
Barbara.
"In a
lot of
cases
what you
have is
a legal
commitment
to
nondiscrimination,
but a
quiet
continuation
of
previous
cultural
norms,"
Mr.
Belkin
said.
"But
here you
have not
only a
reversal
of
policy
and a
formal
commitment
to
nondiscrimination,
but a
proactive
embracing
of the
idea
that
integration
is good
for the
military
and
diversity
is
useful
for
recruiting
from the
fullest
possible
pool."
In
Britain,
Stonewall
currently
advises
about 90
employers,
some of
them big
companies,
about
how
better
to
recruit
and
treat
gay and
lesbian
workers.
It is
this
program
that the
navy has
signed
up for.
"Increasingly,
organizations
are
recognizing
that
having
well-trained
and
highly
committed
staff
who feel
comfortable
in the
workplace
is
highly
important,"
said
Alan
Wartle,
a
spokesman
for
Stonewall.
"It's
about
having a
range of
policies
and also
about
the more
intangible
element,
the
cultural
change."
Commodore
Docherty
said one
likely
step for
the navy
would be
to begin
advertising
in gay
publications,
as part
of a
general
recruitment
effort.
"We
advertise
in a lot
of
magazines,"
he said.
"For
instance,
we
advertise
in
cycling
and
swimming
magazines
- not
because
we're
after
cyclists
and
swimmers
particularly,
but
because
it's
part of
our
target
audience
of
16-to-24-year-olds."
Gays in
the
British
military
are
subject
to the
same
rules of
sexual
conduct
as
heterosexuals:
no
touching,
no
kissing,
no
flaunting
of
sexuality.
Since
1991,
women
have
been
allowed
to serve
with men
on
ships,
which
operate
under
strict
"no sex"
rules,
and
sailors
in such
close
quarters
have
relied
on what
one
naval
official
said was
"common
sense
and good
manners."
Despite
the
change
in
policy,
relatively
few gay
men and
lesbians
in the
military
-
whether
because
of fear
of being
intimidated,
or
because
of
personal
choice -
have
come
out. The
services
do not
keep
statistics
on the
number
of gays,
holding
by the
principle,
Commander
Jones
said,
that
"sexuality
is a
private
matter
for the
individual."
He
called
the
announcement
by the
navy on
Monday
"a huge
step
forward."
"You get
folks
like me
who
choose
to be
out, and
there
are
others
who
don't -
it's up
to
them,"
he said.
"We've
come a
very,
very
long way
in five
years,
but we
don't
want to
be
complacent."
Commodore
Docherty
said the
navy was
trying
to send
a clear
message.
"The
fact
that we
are
making
this
high-level
commitment
will
hopefully
show
people
that
it's not
just
empty
words
when we
talk
about
diversity
and
opportunity,"
he said,
"but are
actually
taking
action
to do
something
about
it."
|
|
|