4msfl.com Home Bars Bar Ads Home Hotels Restaurants Retail UNclassifieds
   
   

Thursday, December 30, 2010 NEWS

http://anthony.c.topica.com/maaddhMabessMciq4dieafpNKl/


 Return to News Home

 

http://anthony.c.topica.com/maaddhMabessMciq4dieafpNKl/

Can New Yorkers marry in Massachusetts?

 

In This Issue:

 

 

 

•  

Mass. Supreme Court To Hear Challenge To Non-Resident Gay Marriage Ban

 

 

 

•  

What does this mean for NY and other out-of-state couples?

 

 

 

 

 

•  

New Course by Royal Navy: A Campaign to Recruit Gays

 

•  

Join The Wedding Party!

 

 

 

 

 

Mass. Supreme Court To Hear Challenge To Non-Resident Gay Marriage Ban

 

by Michael J. Meade 365Gay.com Boston Bureau

Posted: February 23, 2005 11:01 am. ET

(Boston, Massachusetts) The Supreme Judicial Court has agreed to hear a challenge to the Massachusetts law being used to prevent same-sex couples from outside the state from marrying.

Shortly after the court ruled the state could not bar gays and lesbians from marrying Gov. Mitt Romney declared that a 1913 law prevented town clerks from issuing licenses to couples who do not reside in Massachusetts.

The law says that the state cannot marry an out-of-state couple if that marriage would be "void" in the couple's home state. It had been created to prevent interracial marriages.

After Massachusetts began allowing interracial marriages at the turn of the last century states where it was still illegal complained that mixed race couples were going to Massachusetts to wed and then return home to fight the local bans.

The law had not been used since the Supreme Court ruled that banning interracial marriage was unconstitutional in 1967.

Clerks in several towns, including Provincetown refused to heed Romney's demand and issued licenses to out of state gay couples once same-sex marriage became legal in Massachusetts last May. They ended the practice after Attorney General Thomas Riley, under pressure from the governor, threatened to charge the clerks.

The challenge to the law was filed by more than a dozen town clerks from around the Bay State as well as non-resident couples who were denied marriage licenses after the Supreme Judicial Court legalized same-sex marriage.
Gay and Lesbian Advocates and Defenders, representing the couples, appealed to the Supreme Judicial Court to use its discretion to hear the case directly. Initial reviews usually are heard by the state appeals court.

The couples in the original case which legalized gay marriage in Massachusetts lost at the trial court level and won in a direct appeal to the SJC.

The SJC is expected to hear the case in May.

Click here to find out how to help the Mass. effort!

 

http://anthony.c.topica.com/maaddhMabeunyciq4dieafpNKl/

 

What does this mean for NY and other out-of-state couples?

 

Out-of-state same-sex couples all over the country have been waiting for this case to be decided. The Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts (SJC) has agreed to hear the case on an accelerated appeal, meaning that the case will bypass the mid-level appellate court. This is good news!

The accelerated appeal could mean a number of things, however, it most likely signals the court's desire to clear the air on this contentious issue. While the law itself may not pass muster under the State Constitution of Massachusetts, which was the basis for the initial decision allowing marriage for same-sex couples, as the issue is one of full faith and credit (other states' recognition of Massachusetts’s marriages) there is a possibility that the antiquated law may be upheld under the Federal Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA.)

When can we expect to know the SJC's opinion? Once oral arguments for the case are heard, the court may take up to 130 days to issue their decision. This rule is often waived, however, so the latest we can expect their written opinion would be sometime in late August.

by Anthony M. Brown, director of Educational Outreach
The Wedding Party

Click here to check for daily marriage news updates!

 

http://anthony.c.topica.com/maaddhMabeut0ciq4dieafpNKl/

 

New Course by Royal Navy: A Campaign to Recruit Gays

 

February 22, 2005

New York Times

By SARAH LYALL

LONDON, Feb. 21 - Five years after Britain lifted its ban on gays in the military, the Royal Navy has begun actively encouraging them to enlist and has pledged to make life easier when they do.

The navy announced Monday that it had asked Stonewall, a group that lobbies for gay rights, to help it develop better strategies for recruiting and retaining gay men and lesbians. It said, too, that one strategy may be to advertise for recruits in gay magazines and newspapers.

Commodore Paul Docherty, director of naval life management, said the service wanted to change the atmosphere so that gays would feel comfortable working there.

"While some gays were confident to come out, others didn't feel that the environment was necessarily accepting of them," Commodore Docherty said in an interview.

The partnership with Stonewall, Commodore Docherty said, will help "make more steps toward improving the culture and attitude within the service as a whole, so gays who are still in the closet feel that much more comfortable about coming out."

Gays in Britain have benefited from a number of new laws, including one that makes it illegal for employers to discriminate on the basis of workers' sexuality.

Last year, Parliament passed the Civil Partnership Act, which gives marriage-style rights to British gays who have registered as couples. The entire military is subject to the legislation, and starting in the fall, gay couples in the military who have registered under the act will be allowed to apply for housing in quarters previously reserved for married couples.

The new effort continues a pattern of changing official attitudes in the navy - once derided as running on rum, sodomy and the lash, in a phrase usually attributed to Winston Churchill. And while most European militaries have lifted bans on gays, none have been as active as the Royal Navy in encouraging their service.

Until a European court ruled in 1999 that Britain's ban on gays in the military violated European human-rights laws, the navy, along with the rest of the country's military, followed a no-exceptions policy of dismissing service men and women who were found to be gay, often after long and intrusive investigations.

The military had agonized for years over the issue, in the way the United States has, and always concluded that allowing gays and lesbians to serve would prove prohibitively disruptive and would ruin discipline and cohesion.

But after the court ruling, it had no choice but to reverse its policy. Beginning in 2000, the military said gays would no longer be prohibited from serving. It also stopped monitoring its recruits' sex lives, saying that sexuality, as long as it did not intrude into the workplace, should not be an issue one way or another.

Recently, gay men and women in the British services have lived and fought in Iraq alongside heterosexuals without problems, according to military officials.

"I would say that before the European court ruling, it was difficult to see this policy happening or working," said Lt. Cmdr. Craig Jones, a gay naval officer who often speaks publicly, with the navy's approval, on gay rights issues.

"People were quite hot under the collar about it; the admirals, generals and air marshals were really concerned," he added. "I'm quite sure that these folks look now and think, 'What was all that fuss about?' "

Most European countries, including France, Germany, Spain, Switzerland and Denmark, have lifted their bans on gays in the military. But Britain, and particularly the navy, has gone further, said Aaron Belkin, director of the Center for the Study of Sexual Minorities in the Military at the University of California, Santa Barbara.

"In a lot of cases what you have is a legal commitment to nondiscrimination, but a quiet continuation of previous cultural norms," Mr. Belkin said. "But here you have not only a reversal of policy and a formal commitment to nondiscrimination, but a proactive embracing of the idea that integration is good for the military and diversity is useful for recruiting from the fullest possible pool."

In Britain, Stonewall currently advises about 90 employers, some of them big companies, about how better to recruit and treat gay and lesbian workers. It is this program that the navy has signed up for.

"Increasingly, organizations are recognizing that having well-trained and highly committed staff who feel comfortable in the workplace is highly important," said Alan Wartle, a spokesman for Stonewall. "It's about having a range of policies and also about the more intangible element, the cultural change."

Commodore Docherty said one likely step for the navy would be to begin advertising in gay publications, as part of a general recruitment effort.

"We advertise in a lot of magazines," he said. "For instance, we advertise in cycling and swimming magazines - not because we're after cyclists and swimmers particularly, but because it's part of our target audience of 16-to-24-year-olds."

Gays in the British military are subject to the same rules of sexual conduct as heterosexuals: no touching, no kissing, no flaunting of sexuality. Since 1991, women have been allowed to serve with men on ships, which operate under strict "no sex" rules, and sailors in such close quarters have relied on what one naval official said was "common sense and good manners."

Despite the change in policy, relatively few gay men and lesbians in the military - whether because of fear of being intimidated, or because of personal choice - have come out. The services do not keep statistics on the number of gays, holding by the principle, Commander Jones said, that "sexuality is a private matter for the individual."

He called the announcement by the navy on Monday "a huge step forward."

"You get folks like me who choose to be out, and there are others who don't - it's up to them," he said. "We've come a very, very long way in five years, but we don't want to be complacent."

Commodore Docherty said the navy was trying to send a clear message.

"The fact that we are making this high-level commitment will hopefully show people that it's not just empty words when we talk about diversity and opportunity," he said, "but are actually taking action to do something about it."

Click here to go to the Royal Navy website!

 

 

 

 

 

Join The Wedding Party!

 

The Wedding Party needs your help to make our dream come true. By joining The Wedding Party, you will ensure that our message of hope and equality has its most effective impact. We need your help!

SILVER MEMBERSHIP - For your tax deductible donation of $50.00, you will recieve will receive our "Progressive American" lapel pin. You will also know that you have helped spread the message of equality thorughout the world.

GOLD MEMBERSHIP - For your tax deductible donation of $150.00, you will receive The Wedding Party's baseball cap, with our newly trademarked logo! you will also know that you have made a difference in the fight for equality.

PLATINUM MEMBERSHIP - For your generous tax deductible donation of $500.00 or more, you will not only receive our Wedding Party baseball cap, you will also receive your choice of any item from our Wedding Party online store! You will join the ranks of our most dedicated sponsors and know that you have done all that you can to help The Wedding Party spread the word of equality.

Please take a stand and make your membership donation now!

Click here to join The Wedding Party Now!

 

http://anthony.c.topica.com/maaddhMabessNciq4dieafpNKl/

 

 

 

The Wedding Party is a 501(c)(3) nonprofit educational organization.
All contributions are 100% tax deductible.  www.theweddingparty.org